Should Technology Follow Human-To-Human Communication Rules?

What do we expect when we communicate with technology? Do we expect that the technology will communicate with us following the same rules as when we communicate with other people? The answer is yes, and I explain the implication of this in this video excerpt from my Design For Engagement online video course.

Below the video is a summary of what I discuss in the video.

When people interact with each other they follow rules and guidelines for social interaction. Here’s an example: You are sitting in a café and your friend Mark comes into the café and sees you sitting by the window. Mark comes over to you and says, “Hi, how are you doing today?” Mark expects you to interact with him, and he expects that interaction to follow a certain protocol. He expect you to look at him, in fact to look him in the eye. If your previous interactions have been positive, then he expects you to smile a little bit. Next, you are supposed to respond to him by saying something like, “I’m fine. I’m sitting outside here to enjoy the beautiful weather.” Where the conversation goes next depends on how well you know each other. If you are just casual acquaintances, he might wind down the conversation, “Well, enjoy it while you can, bye!” If you are close friends, then he might pull up a chair and engage in a longer conversation.

You both have expectations of how the interaction will go, and if either of you violates the expectations, then you will get uncomfortable. For example, what if Mark starts the conversation as above, with “Hi,how are you doing today?” but you don’t respond. What if you ignore him? Or what if you won’t look at him? What if you say back, “My sister never liked the color blue”, and stare into space. Or perhaps you give him more personal information than your relationship warrants. Any of these scenarios would make him uncomfortable. He would probably try to end the conversation as soon as possible, and likely avoid interacting with you next time the opportunity arises.

Online Interactions Have the Same Rules — The same is true of online interactions. When you go to a website or use an online application, you have assumptions about how the website will respond to you and what the interaction will be like. And many of these expectations mirror the expectations that you have for person-to-person interactions. If the website is not responsive or takes too long to load, it is like the person you are speaking to not looking at you, or ignoring you. If the website asks for personal information too soon in the flow of the interaction, that is like the other person getting too personal. If the website does not save your information from session to session, that is like the other person not recognizing you or remembering that you know each other.

Designers tend to spend a lot of time on “macro” design — layout, color, grids, navigation, as well they should, since those are important. But it is often the “micro” interactions that determine whether or not a product or website is easy to use. Can you fill in the form quickly? Does the label make sense? Is the button in the right place? Did you just get an error message that is undecipherable? Sometimes the micro interaction design doesn’t get as much time or attention, and it is very possibly the micro interactions that are defining the user experience of the product or service.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in courses, design, psychology, usability, user experience
3 comments on “Should Technology Follow Human-To-Human Communication Rules?
  1. Whitney Quesenbery says:

    I bet this is a wonderful blog post. Unfortunately, it’s video with no captions and no video descriptions, so lots of people won’t be able to enjoy it.

    • Susan says:

      Hi Whitney,

      Thank you for the great feedback! I will look into getting captions. Do you have any resources for how to add captions to a video? In the meantime I’ve added more text to the blog post so that people can get the info without having to watch the video.

      Thanks for coming to the blog!

  2. Susan, I enjoyed this video and also the lengthy description that followed it. I’m not sure why anyone would expect more.

    Yes, I can understand that handicapped individuals may expect captions, similar to what is available on TV, but when you’ve provided a transcript or long commentary such as you provided, that seems sufficient to me.

    Just wanted you to know that captions would not enhance the video experience for some of us. In fact, I find them very distracting and usually won’t watch the video. I just read instead.

    Hope this isn’t confusing in any way, just another perspective. I love your insights and often refer to them in my own work.
    Thanks for all you do, Susan!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the Newsletter

News & research on human behavior: Subscribe to our FREE newsletter.



Welcome to The Brain Lady Blog

I'm a Ph.D. psychologist and I write and videoblog about how to apply psychology and brain science research to understand how people think, work, and behave. For more information about me and about the Weinschenk Institute, check out the the Team W website.

Susan Weinschenk, Ph.D.
The "Brain Lady"

Connect

  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Archives

Categories

Contact Us

The Team W
Weinschenk Institute, LLC
625 N. 4th Avenue
Edgar, WI 54426
USA
info@theteamw.com

Susan
Email Susan
@thebrainlady
847.909.5946

Guthrie
Email Guthrie